About
Our experience
The airport programmes our people have worked on over thirty years, with previous employers and partners, in solution, commercial and delivery roles. Each is described from the public record.

Airports and groups
- Changi
- Kuala Lumpur
- Penang
- Hong Kong
- Taipei
- Manila
- Phu Quoc
- U-Tapao (Pattaya)
- Narita
- Delhi
- Hyderabad
- Goa
- Delhi Noida
- Navi Mumbai
- Sydney
- Western Sydney
- Brisbane
- Perth
- Melbourne
- Adelaide
- Christchurch
- Wellington
- Queenstown
- Philadelphia
- Miami
- Fort Lauderdale
- San Jose
- San Juan
- Nassau
- Providenciales
- Winnipeg
- Heathrow
- Gatwick
- Baku
- St Petersburg
35 airports named here are a subset of the more than 100 airports our people have worked with. Groups and authorities include BAA, Malaysia Airports, GMR, Airports Authority of India, NAA, NNIC and Queensland Airports.
Programmes
| Programme | Nature of the work |
|---|---|
| Changi Airport, Singapore | Solution and commercial lead for airport systems designated critical information infrastructure: in-country architecture, hybrid hosting and support model designed and negotiated to meet sovereignty and audit requirements. |
| Western Sydney International | Deal owner and solution lead on a greenfield airport delivered under a master systems integrator structure: product scope, implementation and support defined and negotiated across sponsor, concessionaire and consortium interests. |
| Brisbane Airport | Deal owner for a ten-year airport systems agreement: deal strategy, business case, operating and support model, negotiation to signature. |
| GMR airports (Delhi, Hyderabad, Goa) | Solution and commercial lead working with the group's in-country airport IT services entity: vendor scope, licensing, support tiers and SLA chain beneath a local operator. |
| Delhi Noida and Navi Mumbai | Greenfield programmes structured for local delivery of global product: solution architecture, support model and commercial structure with local installation and field-support partners. |
| Malaysia Airports (MAHB) | Network-wide passenger processing programme won and delivered on a compressed timeline; border-control and local-partner structure for implementation and support across the group. |
| Narita, Japan | Biometric passenger processing programme delivered in partnership with a Japanese systems integrator, with defined scope per party and local partners for installation and support. |
| Japan kiosk and boarding-gate programmes | Self-service kiosk and domestic boarding-gate deployments for Japanese carriers, delivered with local manufacturing and support partners under prime and subcontract structures. |
| Manila, Philippines | Airport systems delivered through a local partner providing in-country network, installation and field support beneath the global product. |
| Miami International | Delivery direction for the migration of airport management, flight information and billing systems: architecture, cutover and support model. |
| US and international airport portfolio | Twenty to thirty concurrent airport technology projects at a time over eleven years: full system replacements, multi-vendor integrations and new-airport commissioning. |

Roles held
Across these programmes our people have held the solution, commercial and delivery roles: solution architect and design authority, commercial and pricing lead, bid director, deal owner, and programme and delivery director. The nature of each role is stated against each programme above.
The systems themselves are listed under Airport systems and technology, and the whole picture fits on two pages in the capability statement.